| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| Guest6595 |
Posted - 10/17/2011 : 10:48:42
best fighter ever? |
| 16 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Guest3492 |
Posted - 10/20/2011 : 12:52:35
Laraque didn't lose too manyquote:
Originally posted by Guest3492
Sugar Ray Robinson, Arturo Gatti most entertaining though, and Ali didn't fight at a favorable, that's retarded, Tyson fought at a favorable time. Still knock ya the f*** out though.
quote:
Originally posted by Guest8384
Guest 4717
I know you are trying to be funny but Ali is not the best. Ask any boxing fan and they will tell you that he fought at a favorable time. Marciano but he doesn't get the credit.
Has to be Semenko, nobody was that intimidating or dominating.
|
| Guest3492 |
Posted - 10/20/2011 : 12:51:17
Sugar Ray Robinson, Arturo Gatti most entertaining though, and Ali didn't fight at a favorable, that's retarded, Tyson fought at a favorable time. Still knock ya the f*** out though.
quote:
Originally posted by Guest8384
Guest 4717
I know you are trying to be funny but Ali is not the best. Ask any boxing fan and they will tell you that he fought at a favorable time. Marciano but he doesn't get the credit.
Has to be Semenko, nobody was that intimidating or dominating.
|
| foolpittier |
Posted - 10/19/2011 : 17:01:33
alex semin bongo style cant be stopped, ask mack staal. |
| Guest9252 |
Posted - 10/19/2011 : 16:33:53
Gotta agree with Stan Jonathan. I don't think Bouchard was ever the same. |
| Guest8384 |
Posted - 10/19/2011 : 11:48:51
Guest 4717
I know you are trying to be funny but Ali is not the best. Ask any boxing fan and they will tell you that he fought at a favorable time. Marciano but he doesn't get the credit.
Has to be Semenko, nobody was that intimidating or dominating. |
| Guest4717 |
Posted - 10/19/2011 : 10:46:36
I'm not even sure why this is in dispute. Muhammed Ali, obviously. |
| Guest5091 |
Posted - 10/19/2011 : 09:27:14
I'd second Chara. Don't think he's ever lost a fight... Then again, with that much reach advantage, it would be hard for him to do so.
According to hockeyfights, in the ones with enough votes, he's got:
11 Wins (Harrison, Rupp, Thorburn, Valabik, Artyukhin, Koci, Latendresse, Lecavalier (lol), Ivanans, Gleason, Cairns)
6 Draws (Neil, Gaustad, Laracque, Brashear, Brennan, Simon)
0 Losses
Pretty good, considering his wins are mostly against goons from the minors looking to make a name for themselves by taking him out and his draws are mostly against known heavyweights.
Of the choices on the (really odd) list, I'd go with Probert. |
| Guest9701 |
Posted - 10/19/2011 : 08:03:11
hands down it has to be maxim lapierre! |
| Pasty7 |
Posted - 10/19/2011 : 04:50:03
I cannot recall to many fights that Laraque came out on the loseing end, i think he is the champ for now
"I led the league in "Go get 'em next time." - Bob Uecker
|
| Guest8149 |
Posted - 10/18/2011 : 16:13:35
Coming at it from a "who cares" angle, I would have to pick a player not on the list, and one who doesn't really care to fight: Zdeno Chara.
He is probably the strongest/toughest guy in the NHL. He rarely fights, but when engaged, it's usually quite lopsided.
He's too valuable to his team to be fighting, and at the same time, there are few players who want to mix it up with Chara. |
| Guest4755 |
Posted - 10/18/2011 : 14:17:51
stan johnathan say no more. |
| Guest1415 |
Posted - 10/17/2011 : 20:19:02
who cares |
| Oilearl |
Posted - 10/17/2011 : 19:19:04
gotta go other and Dave Semenko!!! |
| Guest4682 |
Posted - 10/17/2011 : 15:52:45
I would Put Rick Rypien at the top of the best fighters ever in the NHL.. He wasnt the Bigget but man he Loved to fight the Biggest..I dont think we well ever see another guy like Rypien .. RIP... Jet forever..
|
| Guest6786 |
Posted - 10/17/2011 : 13:41:13
don't forget about half the team from the broad street bullies..
and one of Don Cherry's fav's John Wensink |
| foolpittier |
Posted - 10/17/2011 : 12:38:55
i don't understand why 3 of these guys are even on this list. i'd put mcsorley,grimson and odjick in their spot's. and many more before them. not to be a d@#k. |
