| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| brentrock2 |
Posted - 11/05/2009 : 13:08:42
Which top 6-7 D-men do you like and why? |
| 5 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| Alex116 |
Posted - 11/06/2009 : 15:07:24
Nothing sneakin' by ol' Fat Elvis huh
Brentrock....time to wake up. I mean, really, do you not have your own opinion? Or do your typing skills lack that much that it would take too long to type something so you cut and paste? What's worse is no one will ever know if you really agree with what you've plagiarized!
tsk, tsk....
 |
| Guest5382 |
Posted - 11/06/2009 : 09:00:23
quote:
Originally posted by brentrock2
Tempted to say Hawks. Will in fact do so. The combination of having lots of guns on the blueline and allowing - by a fair margin - the least amount of shots in the NHL... pretty decent. Stellar first pairing. Great mobility all around. Excellent passing skills and PP qualities. Perhaps a little thin when it comes to the PK, but that is all I have.
Name wise I think Philly looks fantastic. But they aren't as solid as they 'sound', at least not yet. Wings don't look what they were, but you gotta respect them and imagine that they'll find their way.
Calgary has names too for sure, but what little I have seen of them, it looks like Kipper is a bigger reason for their success than keeping teams away from chances.
Pens IMO are better than what most give our D-group credit for. Certainly before the season. With everyone ready, we're better on the blueline than we were in the playoffs last year. Few outside of our fanbase believed that. In a bang for the buck sense at least, I think Pens are hard to beat.
Anyways looks like I said enough for once. lol
Again another one line post with the remaining blurb plagiarized. Wasn't there another user that plagiarised before and promised they would never do it again (but then plagiarised shortly after). Is this the same person? Nice catch Elvis!!
No wonder brentrock only posts one liners, they can't think of anything more than one line of originality.
I wwonder if any of the one liners are an original thought? |
| fat_elvis_rocked |
Posted - 11/06/2009 : 08:42:36
quote:
Originally posted by brentrock2
Tempted to say Hawks. Will in fact do so. The combination of having lots of guns on the blueline and allowing - by a fair margin - the least amount of shots in the NHL... pretty decent. Stellar first pairing. Great mobility all around. Excellent passing skills and PP qualities. Perhaps a little thin when it comes to the PK, but that is all I have.
Name wise I think Philly looks fantastic. But they aren't as solid as they 'sound', at least not yet. Wings don't look what they were, but you gotta respect them and imagine that they'll find their way.
Calgary has names too for sure, but what little I have seen of them, it looks like Kipper is a bigger reason for their success than keeping teams away from chances.
Pens IMO are better than what most give our D-group credit for. Certainly before the season. With everyone ready, we're better on the blueline than we were in the playoffs last year. Few outside of our fanbase believed that. In a bang for the buck sense at least, I think Pens are hard to beat.
Anyways looks like I said enough for once. lol
HABS RULE!!
brentrock2
except YOU didn't say it.
Plagiarism is illegal in some forms.
Have an original thought, stealing someone else's is lame. Someone call this kid's parents and get his computer priveleges taken away, this kind of crap lowers the quality of any forum.
Pasted from another forum site;
Quote;
Yesterday, 04:09 AM #15
There's only one 66
We're at it again!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Shanghai, China
Posts: 4,066
vCash: 500 Tempted to say Hawks. Will in fact do so. The combination of having lots of guns on the blueline and allowing - by a fair margin - the least amount of shots in the NHL... pretty decent. Stellar first pairing. Great mobility all around. Excellent passing skills and PP qualities. Perhaps a little thin when it comes to the PK, but that is all I have.
Name wise I think Philly looks fantastic. But they aren't as solid as they 'sound', at least not yet. Wings don't look what they were, but you gotta respect them and imagine that they'll find their way.
Calgary has names too for sure, but what little I have seen of them, it looks like Kipper is a bigger reason for their success than keeping teams away from chances.
Pens IMO are better than what most give our D-group credit for. Certainly before the season. With everyone ready, we're better on the blueline than we were in the playoffs last year. Few outside of our fanbase believed that. In a bang for the buck sense at least, I think Pens are hard to beat.
|
| M-y-K-E-A-l |
Posted - 11/06/2009 : 01:25:43
I said Vancouver, they can do it all, I love the hitting and Mitchel can do that, I like gritty and guys that play a in your face style. By the end of the season, I hope Vancouver D gets some credit. |
| Mikey Boy |
Posted - 11/05/2009 : 13:36:13
i voted Chicago
young, fast, talented, decent size
MP |
|
|
