| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| C-mac19 |
Posted - 12/09/2006 : 14:33:28
Who got the better of the trade in the off-season, Florida or Vancouver? |
| 9 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| 1 Crosby fan |
Posted - 12/11/2006 : 16:44:23
also true |
| oil guy |
Posted - 12/11/2006 : 15:41:15
I would definately say Van but not because of Luongos play, Bert is done.
|
| 1 Crosby fan |
Posted - 12/10/2006 : 16:25:03
also true |
| Kashmire |
Posted - 12/10/2006 : 16:16:06
I voted Vancouver. Do any of you want a washed up, mentally and physically...let's say disabled forward who instead of giving the gloves a toss and bearing fists comes up from behind and physically cripples another player out of revenge?And anyway, i would much prefer Luongo to Coultier. |
| 1 Crosby fan |
Posted - 12/10/2006 : 15:49:19
I'd say Vancouver because Bertuzzi got hurt and Luongo is playing good |
| Guest6029 |
Posted - 12/10/2006 : 13:03:14
Looks to me like Vancouver got an average goalie at best. He doesn't seem that hot right now. And Florida got damaged goods, physically and mentally. Therefore...EVEN TRADE. |
| Trevman12 |
Posted - 12/10/2006 : 09:15:35
Vancouver. They really needed a good goalie and they got one. |
| bablaboushka |
Posted - 12/09/2006 : 19:43:44
Ugh I'll fix this one too.
C-Mac, you have good ideas for polls, but you gotta clean them up. Take an extra couple minutes and check your wording and spelling before you post them. Instead of correcting the next one, I will delete it, as it is stated in the rules.
Thanks |
| ultimatetitman |
Posted - 12/09/2006 : 19:00:25
I had to pick Vancouver, because I don't know where, who, or what Flordia is? I'd let it slip if it only happened once... and "btter"? Do you not read what you type before you submit it? |
