Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Search
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
 All Forums
 Hockey Forums
Allow Anonymous Posting forum... User Polls
 Importance?

 NOTICE!! This forum allows Anonymous Posting.
 Registered members please login above or input your User Name/Password before submitting!
Screensize:
Authority:  UserName:  Password:  (Member Only !)
  * Anonymous Posting please leave it blank. your temporary AnonyID is
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

  Check here to include your profile signature. (Member Only !)
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Blubberboy Posted - 04/06/2007 : 21:44:58
What do you think is more important to have on a team?
(You can not say all.)
10   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
semin-rules Posted - 04/07/2007 : 08:08:04
Chemistry is the best because if your team can work together and fool the team, then you will have a better chance of scoring instead of always giving it to the best player.

PS. Almost 500 LF

~~~~~COME ON STARS, LETS BRING IT HOME~~~~~
Mikhailova Posted - 04/07/2007 : 07:46:10
Right, but Crosby had enough skill to at least help the team a bit, but there it's tough to maintain chemistry between a player of his skill level and someone who sucks.

Although I think this year would actually be a better example--they weren't doing so great until recently when they made a big push. It takes time for the chemistry to develop between good players
leafsfan_101 Posted - 04/07/2007 : 07:30:20
quote:
Originally posted by Mikhailova

You can have good players and good coaches, but unless they have good chemistry they'll go nowhere. (Examples--the Rangers, the Penguins last year, the Kings)



Pens had no skill last year except for Crosby and Fleury.

Long Live Leafs Nation!!
Leafs Rock Planet Posted - 04/07/2007 : 07:23:40
i think chemistry. if there is to many good players their ego's would get in the way

Leafs 4 Playoffs!!
Mikhailova Posted - 04/07/2007 : 07:23:07
You can have good players and good coaches, but unless they have good chemistry they'll go nowhere. (Examples--the Rangers, the Penguins last year, the Kings)
Saku Steen Posted - 04/07/2007 : 05:57:54
Chemstiry is important. It makes the players good.
leafsfan_101 Posted - 04/07/2007 : 05:38:50
It has to be chemistry. If your players cannot work well together with the team or their linemates then your chances of winning drop very drastically.

Long Live Leafs Nation!!
Canucks Man Posted - 04/06/2007 : 22:41:51
I gotta go with Chemistry, that was a really good example with the rangers from a few years ago, they sucked. look at the Twins, do you think either of them would be point a game players this year if they were on seperate teams, I dont think so.

CANUCKS RULE!!!
Get The Towels Out Guys PLAYOFFS!!!
Blubberboy Posted - 04/06/2007 : 21:48:04
I think better chemistry is more important to have.
For example, the Canucks have not the greatest players, but with all that chemistry in the line-ups, it makes the players even better.
(The coaches are 2nd for me because they put the lines together.)

Go Canucks
Patchy Posted - 04/06/2007 : 21:46:57
I said chemistry, because you can see with the rangers a few years ago that they were a stacked team but they never even made the playoffs. This is somewhat to do with the coaches though (putting the right lines together).

~~Go Leafs Go~~

Snitz Forums 2000 Go To Top Of Page