Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Search
Username:
 Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
 All Forums
 Welcome To PickUpHockey.com
Allow Anonymous Posting forum... Web site comments only
 Request for more intricacies... Allow Anonymous Users Reply to This Topic...		  New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Paterson
Top Prospect

Canada
1 Posts
Posted - 10/09/2006 :  20:02:25  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
First off, LOVE the site... very well laid-out, and the ease of use if very much appreciated!

In addition to "Hemmer"s request to have regular time losses count as -1 to the G of record, our league also has the following:
1 Mandatory Rookie counting in the final totals
1 Mandatory G counting in the final totals
Top 3 point getters of 4 defencemen counting in final #'s
and
only top 12 point getters countin final numbers (in keeping with the above)

Unfortunately, I haven't found how to accomodate these criteria with your site yet, but I much prefer your site for the layout, the statistical references, and of course the price! ;-)

Any chance for help?


James.

EDIT... Please do not drop links

admin
Forum Admin



Canada
2338 Posts
Posted - 10/10/2006 :  07:37:28  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks for your compliments. Currently you can omit the bottom "X" number of players by using the "Bias rule" in the pool details. However you can't specifically ask for the rookie to be counted "always". And there is also no "positional bias rule" like what you are asking for for the D-men either at the moment. It is a good suggestion and we'll look into it for playoffs when weighed against all the other upgrades. We are working on a number of upgrades to our stats and should have many more options ready for the playoffs too.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  New Poll New Poll
 Reply to Topic
Jump To:
Snitz Forums 2000 Go To Top Of Page