Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Search
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
 All Forums
 Hockey Forums
Allow Anonymous Posting forum... General Hockey Chat
 NHL measuring sticks during shootout

 NOTICE!! This forum allows Anonymous Posting.
 Registered members please login above or input your User Name/Password before submitting!
Screensize:
Authority:  UserName:  Password:  (Member Only !)
  * Anonymous Posting please leave it blank. your temporary AnonyID is
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

  Check here to include your profile signature. (Member Only !)
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
Ryan Harper Posted - 03/03/2006 : 09:18:43
Refs will now measure sticks before each shooter - but what happens if the sticks are deemed illegal? Do they get disqualified and lose the shot?
9   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
NuckH8R Posted - 03/07/2006 : 12:27:32
Good point Ripley.

P.S.
Shootouts are lame so who cares.
Ripley Posted - 03/06/2006 : 11:48:47
It's a pretty big deterent if your shooter is Jokinen.
pucker Posted - 03/06/2006 : 10:11:24
I agree with Nazzy - automatic goal for the other team is a huge penalty and will totally stop players from trying to sneak in an illegal stick.

Instead I think the league is just forcing teams to select a new player if it is found that one of the shooters has an illegal stick. Not really a great deterrent.
leigh Posted - 03/05/2006 : 23:17:55
Ya that's true. I guess it's like hooking and holding, you have to draw the line somewhere and if you don't enforce it players slowly take advantage.

I agree with Ripley in this thread, leave it up to the players/coaches to police it.
bablaboushka Posted - 03/05/2006 : 10:23:18
Ok, I understand that, but I still think it's a little "wussy". Each stick/blade/curve has its own set of pros and cons, I just don't see why it has to be regulated. Just me I guess!
leigh Posted - 03/04/2006 : 22:58:02
The big deal on the curve has to do with puck control and puck protection. The bigger the curve the better puck protection it offers and therefore the harder it is to strip the puck off your stick (or for that matter, it's easier to steal the puck from an opponent with a sharper curve) So that is why they regulate the curve.

Of course this fact is irrelevant in a shoot out. But I imagine they don't want two sets of rules, one for the game and one for the shoot out.
bablaboushka Posted - 03/03/2006 : 20:15:42
I still can't grasp the concept of an illegal stick. Who cares if it has more of a curve...what advantage does it give? It's not like in Atom or Peewee where kids (I used to be like this) that wanted the sticks with the biggest curve so they could brag about how easily or how high they could lift the puck off the ice. I could make an educated guess to say that this is not the case in the pros. I say let any player play with whatever curve they want...who cares?
Ripley Posted - 03/03/2006 : 10:45:57
They should just leave it alone. Keep the existing rule: if the other team calls you on it and you have an illegal stick you get a penalty. If they call you on it and you don't, they get a penalty. So simply just adapt it to the shoot out, you should lose your shot....or maybe they should shoot the guy with the lowest points on the team. It would bring a new meaning to the phrase "shoot out". I might even start liking the shoot out then.
nazzy_19 Posted - 03/03/2006 : 10:05:45
Automatic goal for the other team? Just like if the goalie throws his stick during a penalty shot, maybe...

Snitz Forums 2000 Go To Top Of Page