T O P I C R E V I E W |
Paterson |
Posted - 10/09/2006 : 20:02:25 First off, LOVE the site... very well laid-out, and the ease of use if very much appreciated!
In addition to "Hemmer"s request to have regular time losses count as -1 to the G of record, our league also has the following: 1 Mandatory Rookie counting in the final totals 1 Mandatory G counting in the final totals Top 3 point getters of 4 defencemen counting in final #'s and only top 12 point getters countin final numbers (in keeping with the above)
Unfortunately, I haven't found how to accomodate these criteria with your site yet, but I much prefer your site for the layout, the statistical references, and of course the price! ;-)
Any chance for help?
James.
EDIT... Please do not drop links |
1 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
admin |
Posted - 10/10/2006 : 07:37:28 Thanks for your compliments. Currently you can omit the bottom "X" number of players by using the "Bias rule" in the pool details. However you can't specifically ask for the rookie to be counted "always". And there is also no "positional bias rule" like what you are asking for for the D-men either at the moment. It is a good suggestion and we'll look into it for playoffs when weighed against all the other upgrades. We are working on a number of upgrades to our stats and should have many more options ready for the playoffs too. |
|
|