Register | Active Topics | Active Polls | Search
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
 All Forums
 Hockey Forums
Allow Anonymous Posting forum... User Polls
 Best Playmaker currently in the NHL?

 NOTICE!! This forum allows Anonymous Posting.
 Registered members please login above or input your User Name/Password before submitting!
Screensize:
Authority:  UserName:  Password:  (Member Only !)
  * Anonymous Posting please leave it blank. your temporary AnonyID is
Format Mode:
Format: BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough Align LeftCenteredAlign Right Horizontal Rule Insert HyperlinkInsert Email Insert CodeInsert QuoteInsert List
   
Message:

* HTML is OFF
* Forum Code is ON
Smilies
Smile [:)] Big Smile [:D] Cool [8D] Blush [:I]
Tongue [:P] Evil [):] Wink [;)] Clown [:o)]
Black Eye [B)] Eight Ball [8] Frown [:(] Shy [8)]
Shocked [:0] Angry [:(!] Dead [xx(] Sleepy [|)]
Kisses [:X] Approve [^] Disapprove [V] Question [?]

  Check here to include your profile signature. (Member Only !)
    

T O P I C    R E V I E W
ED11 Posted - 03/08/2007 : 07:40:20
Who is the best PLAYMAKER in the current NHL?
40   L A T E S T    R E P L I E S    (Newest First)
BigShow Posted - 04/04/2007 : 03:10:36
...

Playmaking is pretty exclusively referring to players setting up plays for other players. Yes a one man rush is a play. No, that is not what anyone is talking about when they refer to playmaking.

Thornton not in his prime? Thornton may put up better numbers over the next 4-5 years, that does not mean he is outside his prime. Has he peaked? No probably not. Will he win more scoring titles? I don't think he is a favourite, but i wouldn't be surprised at all.
ED11 Posted - 04/03/2007 : 23:41:40
Wow, IHC I could not disagree with you more. PLAYMAKER in the sense that you see the ICE in. Controlling the play. Making that "impossible" pass. It is NOT just "tape to tape" passes as you put it. Creating a scoring chance FOR SOMEONE is what we are talking about. Scoring "single handedly" is just showing that you are a very skilled player. Which Ovechkin is obviously. NO ONE has EVER said that he wasn't. But Crosby is a different type of player. He controls the play by drawing people to him which leaves other players on his team open. Then he makes the PLAY. Much like Thornton, except Thornton is much bigger so that comes to him more naturally. When Crosby does it, it is even more impressive because he does not have that physical presence about him. And it is not like Crosby can't score either. He can. 39 goals last year and 36 thus far this year is certainly not bad in this league. Above all, as I have said before, Crosby sees the ice the best (in my opinion), and I know you're gonna hate this but I'll say it anyway...he sees the ice much like Gretzky did.

Thats what we mean about PLAYMAKING.
I HATE CROSBY Posted - 04/03/2007 : 23:05:04
hmmmmmm..........

Playmaker, as in one whom can make a play?

Scoring goals is the most fundamental PLAY in hockey (well, besides fighting hahahahaha)....

A lot of ovi's goals are done single- handedly, as in he MADE THE PLAY all by himself...As in, there was no play until ovi started it.....Whoever it was who said playmaking is not in a 1-1 correspondance with passing was right....Sid gets lots of assists from his precious powerplay......in a powerplay, the plays are usually all set up.....The only job is to make a good tape-to-tape pass... sid does a great job with those tape-to-tape passes, but the only playmaker on a powerplay is the guy in the penalty box..........I'd like to see numbnuts lead the league in scoring in the "old nhl"........Where 1/2 the game isn't 5 on 4...Iggy getting 50 goals in that defense oriented nhl of 2002 (was it?) is a sign of a true playmaker....

I HATE CROSBY
Canucks Man Posted - 04/03/2007 : 22:43:18
quote:
Originally posted by I HATE CROSBY


OK.....I'll give Terrien a call and tell him to put sid on a line with larouque (I Can't spell) and Rutuu..........See if he can make those guys with bricks for hands "better players"...Those 2 are the equivalent to ovi-ones average teammate

I HATE CROSBY


I see you cant spell Ruutu either, and I wouldnt say he has "Bricks for hands" also, have you seen him in the shootout, and babs was just trying to say that good playmakers make the people around them better, you didnt have to take it as a personal attack on Ovechkin, who by the way I would definalty not classify as "Playmaker" for him I would say goalscorer

CANUCKS RULE!!!
Get The Towels Out Guys PLAYOFFS!!!
ED11 Posted - 04/03/2007 : 21:51:27
quote:
Originally posted by I HATE CROSBY

quote:
Originally posted by bablaboushka



It doesn't matter who a good playmaker plays with, he will make them better players. .


OK.....I'll give Terrien a call and tell him to put sid on a line with larouque (I Can't spell) and Rutuu..........See if he can make those guys with bricks for hands "better players"...Those 2 are the equivalent to ovi-ones average teammate

I HATE CROSBY



Nice little come back there with the Larouqe thing. But I think you know what babs was trying to say about playmakers making players better. Bottom line, Crosby's play affects his teamates more so then Ovechkins play.
I HATE CROSBY Posted - 04/01/2007 : 22:10:02
quote:
Originally posted by bablaboushka



It doesn't matter who a good playmaker plays with, he will make them better players. .


OK.....I'll give Terrien a call and tell him to put sid on a line with larouque (I Can't spell) and Rutuu..........See if he can make those guys with bricks for hands "better players"...Those 2 are the equivalent to ovi-ones average teammate

I HATE CROSBY
bablaboushka Posted - 04/01/2007 : 21:54:06
I wonder if Guerin and Thornton have ever been on the ice at the same time in SJ...

Some players get assists because they play with good players and others make good players great. Sure Marleau, Michalek and Cheechoo are very skilled players but Thornton can bring them to a whole new level. You guys are almost implying that playmaking is just assists, and that Crosby only gets them because of Recchi, Malkin and Staal. Truth is, these two players (Thornton better than Crosby) can CREATE ice for other players. Thornton can circle around the net or behind it and drag 2-3 guys down low, because it is rare that ONE player can contain him. Then, when those players get out of position, Thornton can thread a pass through a seam and find whoever is in the slot or across the ice, which makes an easy goal for the recipient. Thornton opened up the ice and Cheechoo knew exactly how to get into that newly created open ice, which is why they work so well together. Crosby doesn't do that so much as slow plays down and look for nice passes, like the cross-icers he sends to Whitney on the PP all the time. The best playmakers make their surroundings better, no matter who they are. Look at Savard, who is probably the third best in the league. He plays with crap, yet he can find ice that few else could.

It doesn't matter who a good playmaker plays with, he will make them better players. If they play with better finishers than another, then they just get more assists. But remember, assists do not automatically make a good playmaker.
Canucks Man Posted - 04/01/2007 : 21:10:10
quote:
Originally posted by I HATE CROSBY


Hahahahaha, this is an april fool's right.......ahem what about ovi-one?

I think thorton is the best playmaker right now.......He WILL be mario to OVI's wayne .do you guys have a clue how much the rest of the capitals suck....all teams have to do is cover ovi and they will win[this is why ovi has had less points as of late......all teams do is cover HIM.....he has no malkin's, recci's staals or others.]......


Well Thornton has Cheechoo, Marleau, Guerin and Michalek, and your praising him with a pretty good supporting cast

CANUCKS RULE!!!
Get The Towels Out Guys PLAYOFFS!!!
1 Crosby fan Posted - 04/01/2007 : 20:48:16
As much as i hate to say it but he has a point

Winners never Quit and Quitters never win
I HATE CROSBY Posted - 04/01/2007 : 20:46:09
quote:
Originally posted by Beans15

Babs, I agree with your thoughts on Thorton. I think he is the best player in the league today. However, stealing Trophies from Crosby, not going to happen. Thorton will be to Crosby as Lemieux was to Gretzky in the 80's. The next best thing and won't get the hype. He will get the hardware if Crosby gets injured. And it's unfortunate because I think that Thorton is and will always be a better play. Just not as flashy and isn't as marketable.



Hahahahaha, this is an april fool's right.......ahem what about ovi-one?

I think thorton is the best playmaker right now.......He WILL be mario to OVI's wayne .do you guys have a clue how much the rest of the capitals suck....all teams have to do is cover ovi and they will win[this is why ovi has had less points as of late......all teams do is cover HIM.....he has no malkin's, recci's staals or others.]......

I see people calling ovi overrated now, calling him a joke........I haven't seen a caps highlight in weeks...noone shows them.......If he was on pitts and sid was on washington, you'd ALL be calling ovi the best playmaker in the league.

I HATE CROSBY
willus3 Posted - 04/01/2007 : 20:28:14
Just a joke Babs.
bablaboushka Posted - 04/01/2007 : 19:50:26
Please don't start that again. I'm putting a stop to that discussion right now.
willus3 Posted - 04/01/2007 : 18:24:21
quote:
Originally posted by Beans15

Babs, I agree with your thoughts on Thorton. I think he is the best player in the league today. However, stealing Trophies from Crosby, not going to happen. Thorton will be to Crosby as Lemieux was to Gretzky in the 80's. The next best thing and won't get the hype. He will get the hardware if Crosby gets injured. And it's unfortunate because I think that Thorton is and will always be a better play. Just not as flashy and isn't as marketable.


Did you just in a round about way say that Lemieux was better than Gretzky?
LOL
Guest4024 Posted - 04/01/2007 : 18:00:34
henrik sedin=)
Mikhailova Posted - 04/01/2007 : 17:16:26
quote:
Originally posted by -oil-country-

I don't think it's Thornton's fault I think they just lost there chemistry (Mik any jokes ?)


Haha...they lost chemistry? Well they better study harder then

As for the topic, Crosby gets most of his 117 points from assists, which there alone tells you he's a great playmaker. The best? Close, but no. Like babs said, he's full of great passes, but Thornton is the one who really sees things on the ice and creates more options for plays. So I think Thornton wins this one.
bablaboushka Posted - 04/01/2007 : 17:08:10
quote:
Originally posted by Canucks Man

quote:
Originally posted by bablaboushka

How do you figure? Thornton hasn't even reached his prime yet.


I think getting 96 assists in a season puts you in your prime.

CANUCKS RULE!!!


He has 88 as it is now, 4 in the game against LA. If/when he hits 90, he'll be only the 3rd player since Gretzky/Lemieux to have two consecutive 90+ assist seasons. He still has 3 games left after this one, so he'd need 8 assists to match last year. It's not impossible, but even if he ends up with 94 or something, I'd say that's not too shabby. And just imagine if he had a healthy Cheechoo all year, that number EASILY could have hit 100.
T-RAV17 Posted - 03/24/2007 : 06:49:55
I can't believe that Savard has gotten to put up some points in Boston! I thought Boston was done for it when they traded Thorton, but they recovered their offence in Savard

Go Sens!
Canucks Man Posted - 03/20/2007 : 18:44:42
quote:
Originally posted by ED11

I don't know babs, I would definetly say that Thornton is in his prime now. You can't compare guys like Selanne and Thornton. Two WAY different players. I also think that Thornton will have a hard time winning the Art Ross now that Crosby is around. Don't get me wrong here, I like Thornton...I definetly think that he is probably in the top 3 best players in the league. But Crosby is just a special talent. And I completely agree with beans when he says that Thornton is to Crosby what Lemieux was to Gretzky.


I completley agree with that. and Babs Im not saying 96 assists is a limit, im saying it is a very high amount that will be hard to repaeat

CANUCKS RULE!!!
willus3 Posted - 03/20/2007 : 18:43:10
quote:
Originally posted by Beans15

I know this might be off topic, but has anyone else had a chance to see Robert Nilsson play in Edmonton the past few games?? He is one of the players that the Oilers got for Smyth and is also Kent Nilsson's son. He is playing because of all the injuries and Flu in Edmonton.

One word, Wow. For a guy with zero NHL experience, he see's the ice better than a lot of current NHL playmakers. He will be a great Marc Savard like player.

You heard it here first.


I haven't seen him play yet but if he is a chip off the old man's block he could very well be Savard like. They didn't call Kent the "magic man" for nothin'.
ED11 Posted - 03/20/2007 : 18:23:49
I don't know babs, I would definetly say that Thornton is in his prime now. You can't compare guys like Selanne and Thornton. Two WAY different players. I also think that Thornton will have a hard time winning the Art Ross now that Crosby is around. Don't get me wrong here, I like Thornton...I definetly think that he is probably in the top 3 best players in the league. But Crosby is just a special talent. And I completely agree with beans when he says that Thornton is to Crosby what Lemieux was to Gretzky.
-oil-country- Posted - 03/20/2007 : 15:25:42
Beans i totally agree with you, Nilsson does seem to see the ice great, I was at the Minnesota game (which he scored in) and i think he was one of or the best Oilers but keep in mind how many players are injured like Stoll,Hemsky etc. But the part where you said he has 0 NHL experience isn't true he played 53 games last year and got 6 goals and 14 assists for 20 points but still has amzing vision for a sophmore and i can't wait because he will be great in the future.
bablaboushka Posted - 03/20/2007 : 15:25:19
Are you saying that you think Crosby will score more points than Thornton every year for the rest of Thornton's career? Crosby may win the awards based on judging, like the Hart, but the Art Ross is strictly statistical and I think that Thornton still has a couple left to win.
Beans15 Posted - 03/20/2007 : 15:14:44
Babs, I agree with your thoughts on Thorton. I think he is the best player in the league today. However, stealing Trophies from Crosby, not going to happen. Thorton will be to Crosby as Lemieux was to Gretzky in the 80's. The next best thing and won't get the hype. He will get the hardware if Crosby gets injured. And it's unfortunate because I think that Thorton is and will always be a better play. Just not as flashy and isn't as marketable.
bablaboushka Posted - 03/20/2007 : 15:04:17
quote:
Originally posted by Canucks Man

quote:
Originally posted by bablaboushka

How do you figure? Thornton hasn't even reached his prime yet.


I think getting 96 assists in a season puts you in your prime.

CANUCKS RULE!!!


How? Is 96 the legal limit or something? Maybe next year he'll get 110 assists, which certainly isn't unreasonable. He's averaging > 1 assist per game this year with a cold, injured Cheechoo and for half the year a grinder and the other half a still-developing sophomore. Thornton has NOT hit his prime. You can't forget he's only 28 and when you think of a guy like Selanne doing so well at 35, I don't think we've seen the best of Thornton. Thornton is the guy who will steal Art Ross's from Crosby in the future.
Canucks Man Posted - 03/20/2007 : 12:41:01
Yeah beans I thought he played good in the Canucks Oilers game last night.

CANUCKS RULE!!!
Beans15 Posted - 03/20/2007 : 12:30:19
I know this might be off topic, but has anyone else had a chance to see Robert Nilsson play in Edmonton the past few games?? He is one of the players that the Oilers got for Smyth and is also Kent Nilsson's son. He is playing because of all the injuries and Flu in Edmonton.

One word, Wow. For a guy with zero NHL experience, he see's the ice better than a lot of current NHL playmakers. He will be a great Marc Savard like player.

You heard it here first.
Canucks Man Posted - 03/20/2007 : 11:53:51
quote:
Originally posted by bablaboushka

How do you figure? Thornton hasn't even reached his prime yet.


I think getting 96 assists in a season puts you in your prime.

CANUCKS RULE!!!
bablaboushka Posted - 03/20/2007 : 11:48:00
How do you figure? Thornton hasn't even reached his prime yet.
BigShow Posted - 03/20/2007 : 10:30:32
Brad Richards didn't even make the list?

For playmaking the best is probably Thornton, but Spezza and Crosby will be usurping him in the next year or so.
ED11 Posted - 03/19/2007 : 13:13:21
quote:
Originally posted by Guest0910

quote:
Originally posted by Guest0920

spezza is best player maker in game.... gets at least an assist every game... heatley wouldnt be anywhere without him



finally someone else who understands playmeaker and ed11 i am nice your just naive and probably american



Thanks for the insults. I am Canadian by the way. When you come on this site to make comments think about what you are saying because most people here try thinking objectivly when making a comment. As for your thought about Spezza, I agree he is a very good playmaker and maybe I should have put him up there. But I did put other which you could have easily selected and just specified that you thought it was Spezza.

But for the future please try not insulting anyone. Thanks.
bablaboushka Posted - 03/18/2007 : 16:18:09
Guys, enough with the useless banter.
1 Crosby fan Posted - 03/18/2007 : 14:47:37
quote:
Originally posted by Saku Steen

quote:
Originally posted by 1 Crosby fan

HA he was right i picked Thornton



Called that, or is that a joke.....

no i did
Saku Steen Posted - 03/18/2007 : 14:42:42
quote:
Originally posted by 1 Crosby fan

HA he was right i picked Thornton



Called that, or is that a joke.....
1 Crosby fan Posted - 03/18/2007 : 14:11:59
HA he was right i picked Thornton
Guest7039 Posted - 03/18/2007 : 14:04:59
i say its thornton
Canucks Man Posted - 03/18/2007 : 13:42:15
quote:
Originally posted by Guest0920

spezza is best player maker in game.... gets at least an assist every game... heatley wouldnt be anywhere without him


1: Heatley dominated when Spezza was out of the lineup
2: He didnt get an assist last night and has well under an assist per game

CANUCKS RULE!!!
bablaboushka Posted - 03/18/2007 : 13:39:42
0910, if you don't have anything to contribute except for misspelled personal attacks, please don't.

0920, you are way out to lunch! First of all being a playmaker is not just "getting an assist every game" something Spezza doesn't do anyways. It's about creating space for your linemates and being able to spot them anywhere on the ice and set them up for scoring chances.

By the way, Heatley scored 24 points in 14 games while Spezza was out, so you might want to reconsider your second statement too.
Guest0910 Posted - 03/18/2007 : 13:33:02
quote:
Originally posted by Guest0920

spezza is best player maker in game.... gets at least an assist every game... heatley wouldnt be anywhere without him



finally someone else who understands playmeaker and ed11 i am nice your just naive and probably american
Guest0920 Posted - 03/17/2007 : 16:43:02
spezza is best player maker in game.... gets at least an assist every game... heatley wouldnt be anywhere without him
semin-rules Posted - 03/17/2007 : 12:40:25
quote:
Originally posted by Saku Steen

It was a joke! sorry to confuse you guys.



I know it was a joke I was just messing with ya


~~~~~GO STARS~~~~~

Snitz Forums 2000 Go To Top Of Page