| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| juice32 |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 08:10:09
which Canadian City would you like to see the NHL expand to? I know it will never happen........but just for kicks |
| 18 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| fly4apuckguy |
Posted - 05/03/2007 : 22:04:51
quote:
Originally posted by Beans15
Anyone ever see a Regina Pat's game?? I am thinking with a populations base and a decent corporate community, Regina would be the best NHL city in Canada.
I appreciate the love, but as a Reginan (well, I live very close to it, anway), I can say with 100% confidence that Regina could not support an NHL team.
For starters, the Brandt Centre only holds 6500 at best (with standing room). On some nights the Pats only draw 2 000 fans.
Also, Regina has about 190 000 people, and no major centre around it (unless you count Moose Jaw's 55 000). It is also a government/union/leftist/communist (I went too far) city, so there are very few corporate dollars. All the big Regina corporations are now in Calgary.
I voted Winnipeg. They are big enough, have a decent sized arena, and a great fan base already there.
I would have loved to see the Winnipenguins happen, but oh well.
You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - Gretz |
| manninm |
Posted - 05/03/2007 : 12:38:55
Winnipeg has proven time over to be a great hockey town. Granted, I can't imagine the NHL going back there, I think it'd be the best place.
Because the demands on a goalie are mostly mental, it means that for a goalie, the biggest enemy is himself." ~Ken Dryden |
| Mikhailova |
Posted - 05/03/2007 : 12:34:26
quote:
Originally posted by Kashmire
Quebec. I don't understand how Winnipeg "deserves" this team. Could someone explain?
Because they used to have a team, they have great and loyal fans, and the population's big enough (I think) |
| bonfire420 |
Posted - 05/03/2007 : 09:33:28
I voted "other"... Quebec City. I think they have the biggest population out of all the options there and people love hockey there as well. The 'peg was a close runner up. |
| willus3 |
Posted - 05/03/2007 : 06:21:10
quote:
Originally posted by PENSFAN8771
It really makes sense to expand to Winnipeg over the others in terms of a fan base. You can argue about London and NS and Hamilton as sensible hockey towns for NHL franchises (I'm in no way conceding that they are), but the people who live in those cities, the would be "great fans" already have a team they cheer for and have cheered for all their lives, be it TO, Ottawa, Montreal . . . I can hardly imagine a loyal Toronto fan who lives in Hamilton suddenly deciding to go cheer for the new expansion franchise in town and abandon their Leafs, especially en masse. Like Saku, would you just decide to stop cheering for the Canadiens because you had a team in Halifax? I sure hope not, that wouldn't make you a loyal fan.
Sure I enjoy taking in a hockey game as much as the next student of the game, so I may head out to the game of the new team in town. But am I gonna buy the jersey? Nope. Am I gonna get the souvenier beer for the extra 2 bucks? Nope. Am I gonna crowd into a busy bar to watch the game night after night when their away? Nope. Those expansion franchises in Hamilton, London, or Halifax will lack loyal fan bases in their formative years and lead to disasters down the road.
Winnipeg, on the other hand, lacks this deeply rooted allegiance because they lost their team. Instead of allegiance, they have a void. I do have some quabbles about sending a team to Winnipeg though. They refused to build an arena to keep their team, but are willing to build one once they leave. That seems real f***ed up to me. Because of these issues, I voted for the Great White North. They have never had a franchise to screw up and just imagine how good the ice would be there.
The expansion teams through the north eastern states didn't seem to have a problem getting fans to convert from whoever it was they cheered for. The Islanders for instance joined the same city as the existing Rangers. I don't think people in London or Hamilton would have any problem cheering for their new team. Especially considering the way the Leafs organization has abused their fans by not providing an excellent team year after year when they easily could have afforded to. Loyalty schmoyalty.
"If you're travelling in a vehicle at the speed of light and you turn your lights on, do they do anything?" - Steven Wright |
| Saku Steen |
Posted - 05/03/2007 : 03:47:54
quote:
Originally posted by PENSFAN8771
It really makes sense to expand to Winnipeg over the others in terms of a fan base. You can argue about London and NS and Hamilton as sensible hockey towns for NHL franchises (I'm in no way conceding that they are), but the people who live in those cities, the would be "great fans" already have a team they cheer for and have cheered for all their lives, be it TO, Ottawa, Montreal . . . I can hardly imagine a loyal Toronto fan who lives in Hamilton suddenly deciding to go cheer for the new expansion franchise in town and abandon their Leafs, especially en masse. Like Saku, would you just decide to stop cheering for the Canadiens because you had a team in Halifax? I sure hope not, that wouldn't make you a loyal fan.
Sure I enjoy taking in a hockey game as much as the next student of the game, so I may head out to the game of the new team in town. But am I gonna buy the jersey? Nope. Am I gonna get the souvenier beer for the extra 2 bucks? Nope. Am I gonna crowd into a busy bar to watch the game night after night when their away? Nope. Those expansion franchises in Hamilton, London, or Halifax will lack loyal fan bases in their formative years and lead to disasters down the road.
Winnipeg, on the other hand, lacks this deeply rooted allegiance because they lost their team. Instead of allegiance, they have a void. I do have some quabbles about sending a team to Winnipeg though. They refused to build an arena to keep their team, but are willing to build one once they leave. That seems real f***ed up to me. Because of these issues, I voted for the Great White North. They have never had a franchise to screw up and just imagine how good the ice would be there.
lol, what I was thinking was if we got a team, I could go watch the Habs! Or finally just see a NHL game!
PS. Montreal would be my fav. team but Halifax would be a very close 2nd. |
| Kashmire |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 19:59:52
Quebec. I don't understand how Winnipeg "deserves" this team. Could someone explain? |
| PainTrain |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 19:15:25
Winnipeg is the more logical one but if the NHL came to Regina, Regina would go crazy for there team. |
| Patchy |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 19:09:02
I said Winnipeg, it was a shame to take away the Jets from them.
~~Go Leafs Go~~ |
| Beans15 |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 18:56:39
Anyone ever see a Regina Pat's game?? I am thinking with a populations base and a decent corporate community, Regina would be the best NHL city in Canada. |
| PENSFAN8771 |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 17:42:37
It really makes sense to expand to Winnipeg over the others in terms of a fan base. You can argue about London and NS and Hamilton as sensible hockey towns for NHL franchises (I'm in no way conceding that they are), but the people who live in those cities, the would be "great fans" already have a team they cheer for and have cheered for all their lives, be it TO, Ottawa, Montreal . . . I can hardly imagine a loyal Toronto fan who lives in Hamilton suddenly deciding to go cheer for the new expansion franchise in town and abandon their Leafs, especially en masse. Like Saku, would you just decide to stop cheering for the Canadiens because you had a team in Halifax? I sure hope not, that wouldn't make you a loyal fan.
Sure I enjoy taking in a hockey game as much as the next student of the game, so I may head out to the game of the new team in town. But am I gonna buy the jersey? Nope. Am I gonna get the souvenier beer for the extra 2 bucks? Nope. Am I gonna crowd into a busy bar to watch the game night after night when their away? Nope. Those expansion franchises in Hamilton, London, or Halifax will lack loyal fan bases in their formative years and lead to disasters down the road.
Winnipeg, on the other hand, lacks this deeply rooted allegiance because they lost their team. Instead of allegiance, they have a void. I do have some quabbles about sending a team to Winnipeg though. They refused to build an arena to keep their team, but are willing to build one once they leave. That seems real f***ed up to me. Because of these issues, I voted for the Great White North. They have never had a franchise to screw up and just imagine how good the ice would be there. |
| Guest2049 |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 17:31:51
Quebec city. (that's a period that follows that btw) |
| Saku Steen |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 16:33:08
I have to say Winnipeg, they really deserve a team. I wish that Halifax had one but we probably dont have a chance |
| leafsfan_101 |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 15:27:21
I had to go with Winnepeg. They deserve a team out there asap.
When life gives you lemons throw them at the Ottawa Senators and their fans and hope it gets them in the eyes ;) |
| semin-rules |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 14:38:53
The 'Peg"
~~~~~Great season Stars, better luck next year~~~~~ |
| Mikhailova |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 14:38:13
The only possible option would be Winnipeg. I had a whole thread going about this in General Chat... |
| PuckNuts |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 08:59:43
London, Ontario...
Lead, follow, or get out of the way... |
| juice32 |
Posted - 05/02/2007 : 08:12:39
I had to go with "THE ROCK". We eat, sleep, and breath hockey out here!!!!! we also miss the baby Leafs |
|
|
