| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
B-rett10
Rookie
Canada
186 Posts |
 Posted - 12/13/2006 : 20:00:19
|
Poll Question:
If you owned an NHL franchise and you had to trade one of your players, who would you trade? but all these players are not on your team only the one you pick is on your team.
|
|
Edited by - B-rett10 on 12/13/2006 20:01:35
|
|
|
B-rett10
Rookie
Canada
186 Posts |
Posted - 12/13/2006 : 20:04:06
|
| I really like Thornton, so I picked that one. |
Edited by - B-rett10 on 12/13/2006 20:04:37 |
 |
|
|
bablaboushka
PickupHockey Veteran
Canada
2417 Posts |
Posted - 12/13/2006 : 20:16:26
|
| I also like Thornton (even before the SJ days) but I couldn't trade away Jagr. |
|
|
|
1 Crosby fan
PickupHockey Veteran
Canada
1454 Posts |
Posted - 12/13/2006 : 22:26:13
|
| i'd trade Ovechkin for Crosby |
|
|
|
Guest4681
( )
|
Posted - 12/13/2006 : 23:00:47
|
| I could only seriously trade Gaborik and Forsberg, cause they are both good players, but are also part of the Band-Aid Brigade. All those other guys are franchise players and there is no way I would trade them, not even for each other. Except Cam Ward who is a really good young goaltender( and has been a proven No.1 since his days in Red Deer where he stole the show in the WHL), but for Luongo, come on, he has not been proven yet, and I say yet, even with the cup. Cause he came in as a back-up into playoffs and had a good team in front of him, and he is just now a starter. Luongo is proven, the guy can win games, struggling a bit, but doesn't have a huge supporting cast. So Band-Aid Brigade it is. |
|
|
|
Trevman12
Rookie
Canada
182 Posts |
Posted - 12/14/2006 : 06:00:10
|
| Forsberg is getting old, and if Gaborik stays un-injured, then he'll be amazing. |
|
|
|
B-rett10
Rookie
Canada
186 Posts |
Posted - 12/14/2006 : 06:02:55
|
True  |
|
|
|
framer87
PickupHockey Pro
Canada
338 Posts |
Posted - 12/14/2006 : 10:46:36
|
Ovechkin for Crosby because Crosby is looking alot better then Ovechkin this year but Ovechkin doesnt have much of a supporting cast so I don't know it would be close.
Go pens |
|
|
|
Novie
PickupHockey Pro
Canada
452 Posts |
Posted - 12/14/2006 : 10:52:59
|
quote:
Originally posted by framer87
Ovechkin for Crosby because Crosby is looking alot better then Ovechkin this year but Ovechkin doesnt have much of a supporting cast so I don't know it would be close.
Go pens
Who is Sid's supporting cast?
Once again backing up my opinion that Ovechkin is an unstoppable talent, while Sid makes the players around him better.
Go Sens |
|
|
|
spearbelly
Top Prospect
Canada
98 Posts |
Posted - 12/16/2006 : 00:04:01
|
| Currently Forsberg for Gaborik makes the most sense.However if both were 93% healthy (thats 100% for their heap of bones ) and I was making a cup run I'd not do the deal.Other than that I'd do the deal as there' s more upside with the youthier (by 9 yrs ) Gaborik who can turn defenders inside out with his delicious change of pace................................Can't understand why most of the votes are with Ovechkin for Crosby.Even though different styles , they are quite equal in talent, impact and marketabillity..............................Stall for Naslund , ARE YOU WHACKED??????? ......can't waste valuable breathing time on that one............................Second best trade ,of that list ,would be Sundin for Rolston(Before I go in to hiding from the wrath of all the Soup Boy fans , I'll briefly explain)...Rolston's speed combined with a hard working defensive awareness and his ability to generate offense REGARDLESS of his surroundings is only one of the reasons.The other SIGNIFICANT benefit would be freeing up Soup Boy's salary to replace it with say 5 Rolston,Peca Tucker Roberts Gionta types to attain determination , grit and intensity along with some scoring capabilities ,yet maintaining defensive skills....................I know .I know then you'd have a team without a (questionable) SOUP er STAR and you'd end up looking like the Devils or Canes or having to work hard in unison like the Flames ,Ducks,Preds or Oilers in order to have any success.....................DAGNABIT |
|
|
|
B-rett10
Rookie
Canada
186 Posts |
Posted - 12/16/2006 : 22:20:40
|
| Nice comment, Superbelly |
|
|
|
framer87
PickupHockey Pro
Canada
338 Posts |
Posted - 12/17/2006 : 08:39:32
|
quote:
Originally posted by spearbelly
Currently Forsberg for Gaborik makes the most sense.However if both were 93% healthy (thats 100% for their heap of bones ) and I was making a cup run I'd not do the deal.Other than that I'd do the deal as there' s more upside with the youthier (by 9 yrs ) Gaborik who can turn defenders inside out with his delicious change of pace................................Can't understand why most of the votes are with Ovechkin for Crosby.Even though different styles , they are quite equal in talent, impact and marketabillity..............................Stall for Naslund , ARE YOU WHACKED??????? ......can't waste valuable breathing time on that one............................Second best trade ,of that list ,would be Sundin for Rolston(Before I go in to hiding from the wrath of all the Soup Boy fans , I'll briefly explain)...Rolston's speed combined with a hard working defensive awareness and his ability to generate offense REGARDLESS of his surroundings is only one of the reasons.The other SIGNIFICANT benefit would be freeing up Soup Boy's salary to replace it with say 5 Rolston,Peca Tucker Roberts Gionta types to attain determination , grit and intensity along with some scoring capabilities ,yet maintaining defensive skills....................I know .I know then you'd have a team without a (questionable) SOUP er STAR and you'd end up looking like the Devils or Canes or having to work hard in unison like the Flames ,Ducks,Preds or Oilers in order to have any success.....................DAGNABIT
LOL yeah
Go pens |
|
|
|
B-rett10
Rookie
Canada
186 Posts |
Posted - 12/17/2006 : 14:09:16
|
quote:
Originally posted by spearbelly
Currently Forsberg for Gaborik makes the most sense.However if both were 93% healthy (thats 100% for their heap of bones ) and I was making a cup run I'd not do the deal.Other than that I'd do the deal as there' s more upside with the youthier (by 9 yrs ) Gaborik who can turn defenders inside out with his delicious change of pace................................Can't understand why most of the votes are with Ovechkin for Crosby.Even though different styles , they are quite equal in talent, impact and marketabillity..............................Stall for Naslund , ARE YOU WHACKED??????? ......can't waste valuable breathing time on that one............................Second best trade ,of that list ,would be Sundin for Rolston(Before I go in to hiding from the wrath of all the Soup Boy fans , I'll briefly explain)...Rolston's speed combined with a hard working defensive awareness and his ability to generate offense REGARDLESS of his surroundings is only one of the reasons.The other SIGNIFICANT benefit would be freeing up Soup Boy's salary to replace it with say 5 Rolston,Peca Tucker Roberts Gionta types to attain determination , grit and intensity along with some scoring capabilities ,yet maintaining defensive skills....................I know .I know then you'd have a team without a (questionable) SOUP er STAR and you'd end up looking like the Devils or Canes or having to work hard in unison like the Flames ,Ducks,Preds or Oilers in order to have any success.....................DAGNABIT
Spearbelly I like the Explanation.  |
|
|
|
B-rett10
Rookie
Canada
186 Posts |
Posted - 12/17/2006 : 14:11:16
|
quote:
Originally posted by framer87
Ovechkin for Crosby because Crosby is looking alot better then Ovechkin this year but Ovechkin doesnt have much of a supporting cast so I don't know it would be close.
Go pens
Ovechkin is heating up now 6 ponits in 2 games, but I know what your going to say Crosby got 10 ponits in 2 games. I really like Ovechkin over crosby. |
|
|
|
C-mac19
Top Prospect
10 Posts |
Posted - 12/28/2006 : 16:07:09
|
| i have 2 points to make hossa and kovolchuck(sry for my spellling) are on the same team so how could u trade for them and a tarde for sakic is a great trade any day |
|
|
|
Kashmire
PickupHockey Pro
Canada
506 Posts |
Posted - 12/28/2006 : 16:27:13
|
| Sakic for Gagne looks pretty decent. Gange has been very inconsistent while Sakic has 39 points so far in this season. The second take out Gagne and put Sakic in the dressing room you will see sigificant difference(in a GOOD way : ) |
|
|
|
Mikhailova
PickupHockey All-Star
USA
2918 Posts |
Posted - 12/28/2006 : 16:38:50
|
| I said Gagne for Sakic. Sakic is great, and I almost said Ovechkin for Crosby but I'd want them both on my team |
|
|
|
-oil-country-
PickupHockey Pro
Canada
988 Posts |
Posted - 12/30/2006 : 22:19:05
|
| definetely Gagne for Sakic, Sakic isn't just a great 2-way player he is a great leader |
|
|
|
Blubberboy
Rookie
155 Posts |
Posted - 12/31/2006 : 15:51:20
|
Gagne for Sakic.
Sakic is better than Gagne.
Who will agree with me???
Go Vancouver
|
|
|
|
semin-rules
PickupHockey Veteran
Canada
1915 Posts |
Posted - 01/31/2007 : 16:37:40
|
i picked E. Staal for M. Naslund
Naslund is doing really bad right now and Staal is on fire
like 1 month ago the Canucks captain didn't score for almost 20 games!!
Staal is way better than that
~~~~~GO STARS~~~~~ |
|
|
|
-oil-country-
PickupHockey Pro
Canada
988 Posts |
Posted - 01/31/2007 : 18:59:56
|
quote:
Originally posted by semin-rules
i picked E. Staal for M. Naslund
Naslund is doing really bad right now and Staal is on fire
like 1 month ago the Canucks captain didn't score for almost 20 games!!
Staal is way better than that
~~~~~GO STARS~~~~~
that doesn't make any sense why would you do the trade if you think Staal is better? |
|
|
|
KariyaSelanne
PickupHockey Pro
Canada
297 Posts |
Posted - 01/31/2007 : 20:23:08
|
I would definetely trade Sakic for Gagne, Sakic is a born leader and Gagne hasn't been doing that great.
Go Preds Go!!! |
|
|
|
Guest1444
( )
|
Posted - 01/31/2007 : 21:58:42
|
| I would definatly trade jagr for thornton i mean good god jagr may be a wicked passer.. but thornton is better!!. |
Edited by - bablaboushka on 02/01/2007 15:43:03 |
|
|
|
Canucks Man
PickupHockey Veteran
Canada
1547 Posts |
Posted - 02/01/2007 : 11:26:55
|
quote:
Originally posted by KariyaSelanne
I would definetely trade Sakic for Gagne, Sakic is a born leader and Gagne hasn't been doing that great.
Go Preds Go!!!
Dude if u want sakic why are u trading him away, the trade says sakic for gagne, witch means u would give up sakic for gagne. I pivked Ovechkin for Crosby, only cuz i would like to see if crosby could do well without the supporting cast
CANUCKS RULE!! |
|
|
|
-oil-country-
PickupHockey Pro
Canada
988 Posts |
Posted - 02/01/2007 : 16:19:10
|
quote:
Originally posted by Canucks Man
quote:
Originally posted by KariyaSelanne
I would definetely trade Sakic for Gagne, Sakic is a born leader and Gagne hasn't been doing that great.
Go Preds Go!!!
Dude if u want sakic why are u trading him away, the trade says sakic for gagne, witch means u would give up sakic for gagne. I pivked Ovechkin for Crosby, only cuz i would like to see if crosby could do well without the supporting cast
CANUCKS RULE!!
no it doesn't it says Gagne for Sakic |
|
|
|
Canucks Man
PickupHockey Veteran
Canada
1547 Posts |
Posted - 02/01/2007 : 16:55:06
|
oil-country, his post says sakic for gagne, that is what i was refering to
CANUCKS RULE!! |
|
|
|
-oil-country-
PickupHockey Pro
Canada
988 Posts |
Posted - 02/01/2007 : 16:58:49
|
| oh sorry i understand now |
|
|
|
leafsfan_101
PickupHockey Veteran
Canada
1530 Posts |
Posted - 02/01/2007 : 18:30:21
|
Ward for Luongo. Ward only had a good playoff run and has played ok this year but Luongo is a premier, and probably the best, goalie in the league. And a Leafs fan is saying this.
~You play to win the Game~ Herm Edwards |
|
|
|
ryschevy1
Rookie
Canada
186 Posts |
Posted - 02/02/2007 : 15:13:04
|
Why are Loungo and Ward even being compared to each other. As much as I hate the Nuck's Luongo is BY FAR the better goalie, and if I could unload Ward for Luongo, seems like a no-brainer to me! Thats almost like comparing Roloson to Brodeur!
GO OIL!!! YA!!! |
|
|
|
Datsyuk 1
PickupHockey Pro
Canada
333 Posts |
Posted - 02/03/2008 : 23:17:02
|
| I would probably do the Ward Luongo trade because Luongois the most dominant goalie in the league and Canucks would probbaly suck if they din't have him (even though Canucks are my favorite team). |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
What trade Would you do? 
